KOMPARASI NAÏVE BAYES, SUPPORT VECTOR MACHINE DAN K-NEAREST NEIGHBOR UNTUK MENGETAHUI AKURASI TERTINGGI PADA PREDIKSI KELANCARAN PEMBAYARAN TV KABEL

Mohamad Efendi Lasulika

Abstract


One obstacle of the default payment is the lack of analysis in the new customer acceptance process which is only reviewed from the form provided at registration, as for the purpose of this study to find out the highest accuracy results from the comparison of Naïve Bayes, SVM and K-NN Algorithms. It can be seen that the Naïve Bayes algorithm which has the highest accuracy value is 96%, while the K-Neural Network algorithm has the highest accuracy at K = 3 which is 92%, while Support Vector Machine only gets accuracy of 66%. The ROC Curve results show that Naïve Bayes achieved the best AUC value of 0.99. Comparison between data mining classification algorithms namely Naïve Bayes, K-Neural Network and Support Vector Machine for predicting smooth payment using multivariate data types, Naïve Bayes method is an accurate algorithm and this method is also very dominant towards other methods. Based on Accuracy, AUC and T-tests this method falls into the best classification category.


Keywords


Comparison of Data Mining; Naïve Bayes; K-Neural Network and Support Vector Machine

Full Text:

PDF

References


W. Zhang and F. Gao, “Procedia Engineering An Improvement to Naive Bayes for Text Classification,” vol. 15, pp. 2160–2164, 2011.

A. S. Nugroho, A. B. Witarto, and D. Handoko, “Support Vector Machine,” 2003.

A. Bode, “K-NEAREST NEIGHBOR DENGAN FEATURE SELECTION MENGGUNAKAN BACKWARD ELIMINATION UNTUK PREDIKSI HARGA KOMODITI KOPI ARABIKA,” vol. 9, pp. 188–195, 2017.

M. E. Lasulika, “PREDIKSI HARGA KOMODITI JAGUNG MENGGUNAKAN K-NN DAN PARTICLE SWARM OPTIMAZATION,” vol. 9, pp. 233–238, 2017.

M. Hasan, “Menggunakan Algoritma Naive Bayes Berbasis,” vol. 9, no. Desember, pp. 317–324, 2017.

R. H. Kusumodestoni and S. Sarwido, “Komparasi Model Support Vector Machines (Svm) Dan Neural Network Untuk Mengetahui Tingkat Akurasi Prediksi Tertinggi Harga Saham,” J. Inform. Upgris, vol. 3, no. 1, 2017.

S. Dewi, “Pada Prediksi Keberhasilan Pemasaran Produk Layanan Perbankan,” Techno Nusa Mandiri, vol. XIII, no. 1, pp. 60–66, 2016.

D. B. A. Mezghani, S. Z. Boujelbene, and N. Ellouze, “Evaluation of SVM Kernels and Conventional Machine Learning Algorithms for Speaker Identification,” Int. J., vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 23–34, 2010.

S. B. Imandoust and M. Bolandraftar, “Application of K-Nearest Neighbor ( KNN ) Approach for Predicting Economic Events : Theoretical Background,” vol. 3, no. 5, pp. 605–610, 2013.

E. Prasetyo, “Fuzzy K-Nearest Neighbor in Every Class Untuk Klasifikasi Data,” Semin. Nas. Tek. Inform. (SANTIKA 2012), no. Santika, pp. 57–60, 2012.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.33096/ilkom.v11i1.408.11-16

Article Metrics

This article has been viewed : 69 times
PDF files viewed : 27 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


View Visitor
 
Free counters!

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.