Forensic Analysis for Detecting Deep-Fake Images Using A Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) and The National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) Methods
Muhammad Na'im Al Jum'ah(1*); Hamid Wijaya(2); Muh. Hajar Akbar(3); Suwito Pomalingo(4);
(1) Universitas Sembilanbelas November Kolaka
(2) Universitas Sembilanbelas November Kolaka
(3) Universitas Sembilanbelas November Kolaka
(4) Universitas Muslim Indonesia Makassar
(*) Corresponding Author
AbstractThe development of Artificial Intelligence (AI) has significantly influenced audio, video, and image manipulation techniques, commonly known as deepfakes. Image forensics faces an urgent challenge in identifying and mitigating the impact of deepfake content to maintain the integrity and credibility of digital information. This research aims to perform forensic analysis in accordance with NIST standards and to implement Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) methods to detect deepfake images. Based on the test results, the Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) method can be effectively applied to deepfake image detection. The CNN architecture used can identify the distinct visual characteristics of deepfake images with high performance. The model demonstrates the ability to learn and minimize prediction errors on training data. Accuracy graphs indicate that the model has successfully learned data patterns, as evidenced by consistent improvements in both training and validation data as the number of epochs increases. Furthermore, the loss graph shows a downward trend, signifying a continuous reduction in model error. The precision graph demonstrates the model's effectiveness in reducing false positives, thereby minimizing errors in detecting the original data. The recall graph also indicates improved detection performance on the training data. The ROC curve suggests that the model possesses superior classification capabilities compared to random guessing. Additionally, the Area Under the Curve (AUC) of 0.6544 serves as a quantitative indicator of performance, indicating that the model has moderate capability for class differentiation. Detection results from the CNN model on a dataset of real and deepfake images show that the Confidence and Raw Score values can distinguish between the two; however, the confidence levels still fluctuate around the classification threshold. Low confidence values in certain images suggest that the extracted features are not yet optimal at distinguishing between real faces and manipulated images. Moreover, the application of the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) standards (Collection, Examination, Analysis, and Reporting) for forensic analysis ensures that the evidence gathered is legally accountable in court. Thus, these standards can serve as a scientific reference to ensure a more structured and standardized investigation process for deepfake images. KeywordsImage Deep-fake; Image Forensics; Convolutional Neural Network (CNN); Digital Forensics; National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST).
|
Full Text:PDF |
Article MetricsAbstract view: 107 timesPDF view: 12 times |
Digital Object Identifier https://doi.org/10.33096/ilkom.v18i2.3178.281-291
|
Cite |
References
A. Kwok and S. Koh, “Deep-fake: a social construction of technology perspective,” Current Issues in Tourism, pp. 1–5, Mar. 2020, doi: 10.1080/13683500.2020.1738357.
A. M. Almars, “Deep-fakes Detection Techniques Using Deep Learning: A Survey,” Journal of Computer and Communications, vol. 09, no. 05, pp. 20–35, 2021, doi: 10.4236/jcc.2021.95003.
H. Wang, Z. Li, Y. Li, B. B. Gupta, and C. Choi, “Visual saliency guided complex image retrieval,” Pattern Recognit. Lett., vol. 130, pp. 64–72, Feb. 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.patrec.2018.08.010.
L. Nataraj et al., “Detecting GAN generated Fake Images using Co-occurrence Matrices,” Mar. 2019.
L. Verdoliva, “Media Forensics and Deep-fakes: An Overview,” IEEE J. Sel. Top. Signal Process., vol. 14, no. 5, pp. 910–932, 2020, doi: 10.1109/JSTSP.2020.3002101.
Y. Li and Q. Liu, “A comprehensive review study of cyber-attacks and cyber security; Emerging trends and recent developments,” Energy Reports, vol. 7, pp. 8176–8186, 2021.
H. Farid, “Image forgery detection,” IEEE Signal Process. Mag., vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 16–25, 2009, doi: 10.1109/MSP.2008.931079.
B. Chesney and D. Citron, “Deep fakes: A looming challenge for privacy, democracy, and national security,” Calif. Law Rev., vol. 107, no. 6, pp. 1753–1820, 2019, doi: 10.15779/Z38RV0D15J.
A. Abul Hasanaath, H. Luqman, R. Katib, and S. Anwar, “FSBI: Deep-fake detection with frequency enhanced self-blended images,” Image Vis. Comput., vol. 154, Feb. 2025, doi: 10.1016/j.imavis.2025.105418.
B. N. Al-din Abed, J. Karimpour, and F. Mahan, “A deep fake detection approach for cyber security threat based on deep learning and diffusion-osmosis model,” Egyptian Informatics Journal, vol. 31, p. 100748, 2025, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eij.2025.100748.
G. Bendiab, H. Haiouni, I. Moulas, and S. Shiaeles, “Deep-fakes in digital media forensics: Generation, AI-based detection and challenges,” Journal of Information Security and Applications, vol. 88, p. 103935, Feb. 2025, doi: 10.1016/j.jisa.2024.103935.
C. Cross, “Using artificial intelligence (AI) and deep-fakes to deceive victims: the need to rethink current romance fraud prevention messaging,” Crime Prevention and Community Safety, vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 30–41, 2022, doi: 10.1057/s41300-021-00134-w.
J. Jam, C. Kendrick, K. Walker, V. Drouard, J. G. S. Hsu, and M. H. Yap, “A comprehensive review of past and present image inpainting methods,” Computer Vision and Image Understanding, vol. 203, Feb. 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.cviu.2020.103147.
T. T. Nguyen et al., “Deep learning for deep-fakes creation and detection: A survey,” Computer Vision and Image Understanding, vol. 223, Oct. 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.cviu.2022.103525.
R. Sunil, P. Mer, A. Diwan, R. Mahadeva, and A. Sharma, “Exploring autonomous methods for deep-fake detection: A detailed survey on techniques and evaluation,” Feb. 15, 2025, Elsevier Ltd. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2025.e42273.
O. A. H. H. Al-Dulaimi and S. Kurnaz, “A Hybrid CNN-LSTM Approach for Precision Deep-fake Image Detection Based on Transfer Learning,” Electronics (Switzerland), vol. 13, no. 9, May 2024, doi: 10.3390/electronics13091662.
B. Chen, X. Liu, Z. Xia, and G. Zhao, “Privacy-preserving Deep-fake face image detection,” Digital Signal Processing: A Review Journal, vol. 143, Nov. 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.dsp.2023.104233.
Y. Li, M.-C. Chang, and S. Lyu, “In Ictu Oculi: Exposing AI Created Fake Videos by Detecting Eye Blinking,” in 2018 IEEE International Workshop on Information Forensics and Security (WIFS), 2018, pp. 1–7. doi: 10.1109/WIFS.2018.8630787.
P. Sharma, M. Kumar, and H. K. Sharma, “GAN-CNN Ensemble: A Robust Deep-fake Detection Model of Social Media Images Using Minimized Catastrophic Forgetting and Generative Replay Technique,” in Procedia Computer Science, Elsevier B.V., 2024, pp. 948–960. doi: 10.1016/j.procs.2024.04.090.
X. Chang, J. Wu, T. Yang, and G. Feng, “Deep-fake Face Image Detection based on Improved VGG Convolutional Neural Network,” in 2020 39th Chinese Control Conference (CCC), 2020, pp. 7252–7256. doi: 10.23919/CCC50068.2020.9189596.
F. T. Winata, N. J. Tanuwijaya, R. Setiawan, and R. Y. Rumagit, “Comparison of deep-fake detection using CNN and hybrid models,” Procedia Comput. Sci., vol. 269, pp. 1556–1564, 2025, doi: https://doi.org/10.23919/CCC50068.2020.9189596.
A. Ayub Khan et al., “Digital forensics for the socio-cyber world (DF-SCW): A novel framework for deep-fake multimedia investigation on social media platforms,” Egyptian Informatics Journal, vol. 27, Sep. 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.eij.2024.100502.
J. Wu, K. Feng, X. Chang, and T. Yang, “A Forensic Method for Deep-fake Image based on Face Recognition,” in Proceedings of the 2020 4th High Performance Computing and Cluster Technologies Conference & 2020 3rd International Conference on Big Data and Artificial Intelligence, in HPCCT & BDAI ’20. New York, NY, USA: Association for Computing Machinery, 2020, pp. 104–108. doi: 10.1145/3409501.3409544.
Z. Lai, S. Arif, C. Feng, G. Liao, and C. Wang, “Enhancing Deep-fake Detection: Proactive Forensics Techniques Using Digital Watermarking,” 2025, Tech Science Press. doi: 10.32604/cmc.2024.059370.
A. Ayub Khan et al., “Digital forensics for the socio-cyber world (DF-SCW): A novel framework for deep-fake multimedia investigation on social media platforms,” Egyptian Informatics Journal, vol. 27, Sep. 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.eij.2024.100502.
The NIST Cybersecurity Framework (CSF) 2.0, “The NIST Cybersecurity Framework (CSF) 2.0,” Feb. 2024. doi: 10.6028/NIST.CSWP.29.
Y. Xu, W. Hong, M. Noori, W. A. Altabey, A. Silik, and N. S. D. Farhan, “Big Model Strategy for Bridge Structural Health Monitoring Based on Data-Driven, Adaptive Method and Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) Group,” SDHM Structural Durability and Health Monitoring, vol. 18, no. 6, pp. 763–783, 2024, doi: https://doi.org/10.32604/sdhm.2024.053763.
S. Indolia, A. K. Goswami, S. P. Mishra, and P. Asopa, “Conceptual Understanding of Convolutional Neural Network- A Deep Learning Approach,” in Procedia Computer Science, Elsevier B.V., 2018, pp. 679–688. doi: 10.1016/j.procs.2018.05.069.
S. Lawrence, C. L. Giles, A. C. Tsoi, and A. D. Back, “Face recognition: a convolutional neural-network approach,” IEEE Trans. Neural Netw., vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 98–113, 1997, doi: 10.1109/72.554195.
K. Singh, D. Singh, and N. Mishra, “Review: Convolutional neural networks and its architecture,” Int. J. Health Sci. (Qassim)., May 2022, doi: 10.53730/ijhs.v6nS1.7074.
A. FFaizal and A. Luthfi, “Comparison Study of NIST SP 800-86 and ISO/IEC 27037 Standards as A Framework for Digital Forensic Evidence Analysis,” Journal of Information Systems and Informatics, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 701–718, Jun. 2024, doi: 10.51519/journalisi.v6i2.717.
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2026 Muhammad Na'im Al Jum'ah, Hamid Wijaya, Muh. Hajar Akbar, Suwito Pomalingo

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.






