A TOPSIS-Based Decision Support System for Thesis Title Recommendation: Design, Implementation, and Experimental Evaluation
Firdaus Firdaus(1*); Ritna Wahyuni(2);
(1) Universitas Putra Indonesia YPTK Padang
(2) Institut Teknologi Sawit Indonesia
(*) Corresponding Author
AbstractSelecting an appropriate thesis title is a critical step that significantly influences the direction and quality of undergraduate research. However, students often face difficulties due to limited understanding of research domains, lack of structured guidance, and subjective decision-making processes. This study proposes a web-based Decision Support System (DSS) utilizing the Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) to recommend thesis titles based on multiple criteria. The dataset consists of 120 thesis titles collected from the Information Systems program at Putra Indonesia University YPTK Padang over the period 2019–2024. Data collection involved 10 lecturers and 20 students through questionnaires and interviews to determine the relative importance of four criteria: relevance, availability of references, level of difficulty, and innovation. The system was developed using Python (Flask) and evaluated through experimental scenarios using representative alternatives. The results show that the proposed system successfully generates consistent rankings, with the alternative “Designing Mobile Applications for Local MSME Mapping” achieving the highest preference value of 0.697. The findings indicate that the system effectively balances benefit and cost criteria, providing objective and transparent recommendations. This study contributes to the development of practical and implementable decision support systems in academic environments by integrating TOPSIS into an interactive web-based platform. The proposed approach demonstrates strong potential to improve the efficiency, consistency, and objectivity of thesis title selection, although further validation using larger datasets is recommended
KeywordsDecision Support System; TOPSIS; Thesis Title Recommendation; Multi-Criteria Decision Making
|
Full Text:PDF |
Article MetricsAbstract view: 0 timesPDF view: 0 times |
Digital Object Identifier https://doi.org/10.33096/ilkom.v18i2.2876.292-301
|
Cite |
References
A. Ishizaka and P. Nemery, Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis Methods and Software, Springer, 2013. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-8591-9.
A. Afshar, M. A. Mariño, M. Saadatpour, and A. Afshar, “Fuzzy TOPSIS Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis Applied to Karun Reservoirs System,” Water Resources Management, vol. 25, pp. 545–563, 2011. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-010-9713-x.
C. L. Hwang and K. Yoon, Multiple Attribute Decision Making: Methods and Applications, Springer, 1981. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-48318-9.
E. K. Zavadskas and Z. Turskis, “Multiple Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) Methods in Economics,” Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 2011. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3846/20294913.2011.593291.
E. Triantaphyllou, Multi-Criteria Decision Making Methods, Springer, 2000. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-3157-6.
G. Tzeng and J. Huang, Multiple Attribute Decision Making: Methods and Applications, CRC Press, 2011. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1201/b11032.
F. T. S. Chan and N. Kumar, “Global Supplier Development Considering Risk Factors Using Fuzzy Extended TOPSIS,” Omega, vol. 35, no. 4, pp. 417–431, 2007. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2005.08.004.
H. Zhang and L. Yu, “MADM Method Based on Cross-Entropy and Extended TOPSIS,” Entropy, vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 1852–1870, 2014. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/e16031852.
J. Figueira, S. Greco, and M. Ehrgott, Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis, Springer, 2005. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-23081-5.
J. Jiang et al., “Multicriteria Decision Making Based on the TOPSIS Method and Similarity Measures Between Intuitionistic Fuzzy Values,” Information Sciences, vol. 372, pp. 359–372, 2016. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2016.03.055.
J. J. Buckley, “Fuzzy Hierarchical Analysis,” Fuzzy Sets and Systems, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 233–247, 1985. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-0114(85)90090-9.
J. Wang and Y. Elhag, “Fuzzy TOPSIS Method Based on Alpha Level Sets,” Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 31, no. 2, pp. 309–319, 2006. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2005.06.042.
L. A. Zadeh, “Fuzzy Sets,” Information and Control, 1965. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0019-9958(65)90241-X.
K. Govindan, S. Rajendran, J. Sarkis, and P. Murugesan, “Multi Criteria Decision Making Approaches for Green Supplier Evaluation,” Journal of Cleaner Production, vol. 98, pp. 66–83, 2015. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.06.046.
M. Delgado, J. Verdegay, and M. A. Vila, “Linguistic Decision Making Models,” International Journal of Intelligent Systems, 1992. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/int.4550070505.
M. Behzadian, S. K. Otaghsara, M. Yazdani, and J. Ignatius, “A State-of-the-Art Survey of TOPSIS Applications,” Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 39, no. 17, pp. 13051–13069, 2012. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2012.02.016.
M. Ehrgott, Multicriteria Optimization, Springer, 2005. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-27659-9.
M. Yazdani, P. Chatterjee, E. K. Zavadskas, and S. H. Hashemkhani Zolfani, “Integrated QFD-MCDM Framework for Supplier Selection,” Journal of Business Economics and Management, 2017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3846/16111699.2017.1401555.
P. Chatterjee and S. Chakraborty, “Material Selection Using TOPSIS Method,” Materials & Design, vol. 35, pp. 384–393, 2012. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2011.09.015.
R. Govindan and K. Jepsen, “Supplier Selection Using TOPSIS Method,” Journal of Cleaner Production, vol. 140, pp. 122–130, 2016. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.04.042.
R. R. Yager, “On Ordered Weighted Averaging Aggregation Operators,” IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 1988. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/21.87068.
S. K. Das and S. Kar, “Group Decision Making in Medical System Using TOPSIS Method,” Applied Soft Computing, vol. 40, pp. 542–561, 2016. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2015.10.047.
S. Opricovic and G. H. Tzeng, “Compromise Solution by MCDM Methods: VIKOR and TOPSIS,” European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 156, no. 2, pp. 445–455, 2004. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-2217(03)00020-1.
S. Opricovic and G. H. Tzeng, “Extended VIKOR Method in Comparison with TOPSIS,” European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 178, no. 2, pp. 514–529, 2007. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2006.01.020.
T. Chen, “Extensions of the TOPSIS for Group Decision-Making under Fuzzy Environment,” Fuzzy Sets and Systems, vol. 114, no. 1, pp. 1–9, 2000. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-0114(97)00377-1.
C. Kahraman, S. C. Onar, and B. Oztaysi, “Fuzzy Multicriteria Decision-Making: A Literature Review,” International Journal of Computational Intelligence Systems, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 637–666, 2015. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/18756891.2015.1046325.
E. K. Zavadskas, Z. Turskis, and J. Antucheviciene, “Selecting a Contractor by Using a Novel Method for Multiple Attribute Analysis: Weighted Aggregated Sum Product Assessment,” Journal of Civil Engineering and Management, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 257–266, 2010. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3846/jcem.2010.30.
X. Yu, S. Zhang, and L. Yang, “An Extended TOPSIS Method for Multiple Attribute Decision Making Problems,” Applied Mathematical Modelling, vol. 40, pp. 703–715, 2016. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apm.2015.05.041.
Y. Zavadskas, Z. Turskis, and S. Kildiene, “State of Art Surveys of Overviews on MCDM/MADM Methods,” Technological and Economic Development of Economy, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 165–179, 2014. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3846/20294913.2014.892037.
Z. Yue, “A Method for Group Decision-Making Based on Determining Weights of Decision Makers Using TOPSIS,” Applied Mathematical Modelling, vol. 35, no. 4, pp. 1926–1936, 2011. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apm.2010.11.001.
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2026 Firdaus, Ritna Wahyuni

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.






