The weighted product method and portfolio assessment in ranking student achievement


Andi Tenri Sumpala(1*); Muhammad Nurtanzis Sutoyo(2); Huzain Azis(3); Fadhila Tangguh Admojo(4);

(1) Universitas Sembilanbelas November Kolaka
(2) Universitas Sembilanbelas November Kolaka
(3) Universitas Muslim Indonesia
(4) STMIK PalComTech
(*) Corresponding Author

  

Abstract


The learning process has a correlation with learning achievement which can be shown through the marks given by a teacher to students from several fields of study. The ranking of student learning achievements performed by the school refers to the grades of the subject is important for the SNMPTN (National Selection for State Higher Education). To determine student achievements, the method used in the current study is the weighted product. If the results of student ranking using the WP method have the same value, then a portfolio assessment is used. Of the 127 student achievement ratings, there were seven people who had the same Vector value. Then, the seven people who have the same vector value were graded using portfolio assessment. The results showed that the implementation of the WP method and portfolio assessment could determine the ranking of student achievement.

Keywords


Weighted Products; Portfolio; Learning achievement

  
  

Full Text:

PDF
  

Article Metrics

Abstract view: 391 times
PDF view: 176 times 		     

Digital Object Identifier

doi  https://doi.org/10.33096/ilkom.v13i2.827.148-154 		  

Cite

How to cite item

References


A. Syafii, T. Marfiyanto, and S. Rodiyah, Studi Tentang Prestasi Belajar Siswa Dalam Berbagai Aspek dan Faktor Yang Mempengaruhi, J. Komun. Pendidik., vol. 2, no. 2, 2018.

LTMPT, Informasi Seleksi Nasional Masuk Perguruan Tinggi Negeri. Jakarta, 2020.

C. Josaputri, E. Sugiharti, and R. Arifudin, Decision Support Systems for The Determination of Cattle with Superior Seeds using AHP and SAW Method, Sci. J. Informatics, vol. 3, no. 2, 2016.

A. Fitri, M. Pradnyana, and G. Darmawiguna, Decision Support System for Buleleng Cerdas Program Social Fund Recipient Candidates with Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) and Simple Additive Weighting (SAW) Method, Sci. J. Informatics, vol. 5, no. 2, 2018.

M. Sutoyo, Implementation of Model Yager MADM Method for Selection of PPA Scholarship, JUITA, vol. 5, no. 2, 2017.

D. Prabawati, Pembangunan Sistem Pemilihan Siswa Berprestasi Menggunakan Multiattribute Decision Making Dengan Metode Penyelesaian Weighted Product, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, 2002.

D. Yoni and H. Mustafidah, Application of WP (Weighted Product) Method For Selection of Best Graduate Students In The Engineering Faculty of Universitas Muhammadiyah Purwokerto, JUITA, vol. 4, no. 1, 2016.

A. Jalil, I. Ningrum, and M. Muchtar, SPK Pemberian Kredit Menggunakan Metode WP (Weighted Product) Pada BMT Muamalah Sejahtera Kendari, semanTIK, vol. 3, no. 1, 2017.

B. Santoso, Penilaian Portofolio Dalam Matematika, J. Pendidik. Mat., vol. 1, no. 2, 2007.

E. Turban and Aronson, Decision Support Systems and Intelligent Systems. Prentice Hall International: New Jersey, 2001.

S. Kusumadewi, S. Hartati, A. Hardjoko, and R. Wardoyo, Fuzzy Multi-Attribute Decision Making (Fuzzy MADM). Yogyakarta: Graha Ilmu, 2006.

Janet, Portofolio Sebagai Alternatif Penilaian Autentik dalam Pembelajaran Matematika, in National Science Education Seminar: New Paradigm in Mathematics and Science Education in Order to Enhance the, 2002.

R. Setiamihardja, Penilaian Portofolio Dalam Lingkup Pembelajaran Berbasis Kompetensi, J. Pendidik. Dasar EduHumaniora, vol. 3, no. 2, 2011.

D. Budimansyah, Model Pembelajaran Dan Penilaian Portofolio. Bandung: PT Ganesindo, 2002.

R. Wahab, Psikologi Belajar. Jakarta: PT Raja Grafindo Persada, 2015.

S. Djamaroh, Strategi Belajar Mengajar. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta, 2002.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2021 Andi Tenri Sumpala, Nurtanzis Sutoyo, Huzain Azis

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.